Brightline Is Not The Problem. Our Car First Culture Is

Posted by

If you have spent any time reading national coverage of Brightline, you have probably seen the phrase “killer train” tossed around with a kind of casual certainty. It is the sort of framing that makes for a dramatic headline but does very little to help us understand what is actually happening on the ground. It also places blame in the wrong place.

Brightline, a private passenger railroad the connects Orlando with Miami, is doing something remarkable in Florida. It is offering fast, comfortable, modern rail service in a state that has spent generations building itself around the automobile. Florida is a place where wide roads, long distances, and car dependent development patterns are the norm. In that context, Brightline is not just a train. It is a challenge to the idea that driving is the only way to move.

The service itself is impressive. Stations are clean and welcoming. Trains run frequently and reliably. The onboard experience feels like a glimpse of what American intercity rail could be if we actually invested in it. People who ride Brightline tend to come away surprised that something this polished exists in the United States at all.

So why the dramatic headlines? Why the fixation on tragedy? Why the insistence that the train itself is somehow inherently dangerous? After all, it’s not like the train is jumping off the rails and into homes and businesses like vehicles do when they leave the road.

The uncomfortable truth is that most of the incidents involving Brightline are not caused by the train or its crew. They are caused by drivers who ignore crossing gates, speed around lowered arms, or attempt to beat the train across the tracks. In most cases, investigations have shown that the individuals involved made choices that put them directly in the path of a moving train. That is heartbreaking. It is also not the fault of the rail operator.

It’s a common narrative. If a car swerves into the bike lane and hits a cyclist, it’s because the cyclist wasn’t wearing bright clothes, or was listening to headphones. When someone kills another driver because they were drive 50mph over the speed limit, we still call it a car “accident.” And in the same fashion, while Brightline isn’t running signals, driving drunk or speeding, the passenger rail line is painted as a blatant killer in popular media.

This is what happens in a society that treats driving as the default mode of transportation and everything else as an intrusion. We have built a culture where the car is always assumed to have the right of way, even when it does not. We have normalized risky behavior behind the wheel to the point where it barely registers as a choice.

Brightline is operating in one of the most car dominated environments in the country. It is doing so while providing a service that is cleaner, safer, and more efficient than driving. It is giving people an alternative in a place that desperately needs alternatives. The fact that some drivers refuse to respect rail crossings does not make the train dangerous. It makes our driving culture dangerous.

If we want fewer tragedies, the answer is not to vilify the train. The answer is to take a hard look at the way we drive, the way we design our roads, and the way we talk about responsibility. Blaming Brightline is easy. Confronting our own habits is not.

But if we are serious about building a safer and more balanced transportation system, we need to start being honest about where the real problem lies.

And it is not on the tracks.